England have won the toss in all four Tests played at the Ageas Bowl, choosing to bat first in the previous two instances, in 2014 and 2018 against India, both of which resulted in wins. When asked by Michael Atherton if, in retrospect, it would have been better to bowl first under the cloudy Southampton skies, Stokes stuck by his decision.

“I stand by the decision I made to bat first,” Stokes said at the post-match interaction. “We have got to be good enough to put first-innings runs on the board. That’s what we base our cricket around, if we elect to bat we have to go get 400-500 runs on the board, which, obviously, makes the game a lot more [favourable].

[breakout id=”0”][/breakout]

“We got ourselves in a position to really kick on, get 350-400, same when we came to bat again. We just didn’t quite manage to grasp what we could have done, but it’s a massive, massive learning curve for a lot of our batting line-up and for our young guys as well.”

Did England make the right decision at the toss?
What did Holder do so well?
Should England have picked Broad?@Ben_Wisden, @Yas_Wisden and, er, Viv, look back at the biggest talk points of the day.#ENGvWI pic.twitter.com/HBkKP5zWCl

— Wisden (@WisdenCricket) July 9, 2020

Soon after the match began, seamer Stuart Broad, who was left out of the playing XI, backed Stokes’s call bat first, calling it a”100% right decision”. Stokes said that, despite the England team finding themselves in “great positions”, they weren’t able to clinch key moments in the game.

[breakout id=”1″][/breakout]

“Ideally, we would have liked to get a lot more runs in the first innings,” he said. “It was a first innings v fourth innings Test match, as is the case here generally. We got ourselves into some great positions at times with the bat, but unfortunately, we weren’t ruthless enough to really go on and make our batting innings count.”