Michael Holding, the legendary West Indies pacer who is now a respected commentator, believes India should never have dropped Cheteshwar Pujara, and called for his inclusion in the Lord’s Test against England instead of Hardik Pandya.
India lost a riveting Test at Edgbaston by 31 runs, but that they got close was largely thanks to the efforts of Virat Kohli, the captain, and the bowlers. The batsmen struggled visibly, with the highest score by an Indian apart from Kohli being the battling 31 Pandya managed in the second innings.
Holding said it was imperative India included Pujara in the XI at Lord’s. The top-order batsman was excluded for the first Test to accommodate KL Rahul, despite Pujara spending the summer playing county cricket with Yorkshire.
“One thing I would like to see India do is find a way to get Pujara into this team,” Holding told Sky Sports. “I do not understand how they are so reluctant to play Pujara. He’s too good a player.
[caption id=”attachment_77202″ align=”alignnone” width=”1024″] Virat Kohli has been criticised for his captaincy[/caption]
“If Kohli had no form, would they leave him out? I’m not saying Pujara is as good as Kohli because Kohli is way above everyone else. But when you have (for example) a Rahul Dravid, a VVS Laxman or a Sourav Ganguly who is not in excellent form, do you leave them out? No.”
[breakout id=”0”][/breakout]
Pandya was one of the few Indian batsmen to show the grit and application that Kohli said most of the batsmen lacked in the first Test.
Holding, however, said Pandya was using up a slot for a specialist batsman. “Pandya, it seems as if he’s the golden boy in this team,” he said. “Everyone thinks he’s going to be the next Kapil Dev. He hasn’t shown that yet.
“Why not pick a batsman (instead)? Pandya got a few runs in the second innings but is he a better batsman than Pujara? I don’t think so, and you don’t need him as a bowler in my eyes.”
Sourav Ganguly, the former India captain, touched upon some of what Holding said in a separate post on Instagram. Ganguly believed Kohli was guilty of not giving a consistent run in the team for any player, much like in the case of Pujara, and said that caused uncertainty and insecurity.
[breakout id=”1″][/breakout]
“One criticism for Kohli is that he should give a consistent run to his batters and more time before dropping them,” wrote Gangly. “The captain should give confidence to his players. It’s his team and only he can change their mindset. He will have to sit with them and tell them that if he can do it, so can they.
“He should give them time and tell them to go out and play without any fear. It is true that after continuous chopping and changing of the playing XI, players can get afraid that after all these years, they’ve failed to garner the faith of the team management.”
The second Test will begin at Lord’s on August 9.